The Impact of the Nineteenth-Century Ideal of True Womanhood Essay

The Impact of the Nineteenth-Century Ideal of True Womanhood - Essay utilizationIn the past, the four virtues of piety, purity, submission, and domesticity were considered premier attributes of the True Woman.1 According to Welters tale, maven would have concept that women still should adhere to these austere values of what womanhood really looks like. Of course, this article was written in the posthumous 60s. Women had only had the right to vote for a few years, and it was still rather unheard of for women not to set up married right out of high school. In fact, women who went out of the household to work during the late 60s were seen pretty as rule-breakers. These rule-breakers, in effect, ended up changing the way we think about society and womens roles in spite of appearance it. If these daring women had not stood up and made a case for why they should have been able to go out of the home and work, many women today would not have had the chance to do the samebecause these initial women took a risk. In some ways, having women stay at home is great because they can multitask from home. There be some good things about the historical values that have been placed on women. Women ar largely thought to be gentle, kind people. Of course, this is not always the casebut women who are very female are seen as more highly valued in society because it sticks to that core virtue of piety. Women are in like manner thought to be more pure than menfor whatever reason this is, probably superstar will never know except to say that this is probably more likely true than not, so far though it is a stereotype. Third, women are seen as more submissive than men. This can also be a stereotypebut creation submissive is not necessarily a bad quality unless one has to stand up for ones rights. Fourth, it should be noted that women, as domestic engineers of the homealso known as homemakersare privy to the same kinds of stereotypes that govern the opposite side of the coin , the world of men. The Classist understand Women becoming more independent was not something that men wanted to hear about. Men spokeof religion as a kind of tranquilizer for the many undefined longings which swept even the most pious unripe girl, and about which it was better to pray than to think.2 Religious subjecttions did not cloud, but rather helped, the minds of young girls and women. The sensible horizon that was held that women were delicate and frail and needed someone to help them was a societal view held by Anglo-Saxon men, and this was definitely some sort of classist view. Black women were not regarded as such by white men, and that idea will be explained, entertained, and dissected in the next portion of this piece. However, white women were fair game for being seen as being in need of assistance. In the early 1970s a modern sport of feminism shook American medicine to its foundations and buttressed its sister movement, the patients rights movement. Both movemen ts seek to take patients decisions about their bodies and lives away from physicians especially male physicians and gave women and patients control. The landmark book was Our Bodies, Ourselves, by a assort of women patients in Boston who had access to one of the grandest some would say, most self-satisfied medical centers in the world, Harvard. Because they couldnt get the information they wanted in down-to-earth, patient-friendly language, they published