Dumpster Diving Literary Analysis Essay

How much food do consumers waste? non much, a lot, you wear upont know, or you dont aid? It doesnt seem that many consumers do care. In the article, On Dumpster Diving (1993), Lars Eighner uses exposition, description, and narration to criticize consumer wastefulness.Exposition is the literary whatsis that Eighner uses the most throughout this article. Exposition is when the author conveys his story through explanation. Eighner explains trusted things rather than telling a news for word story close his experiences. Eighner uses this device often in this article such as when he says, I have heard people, evidentially meaning to be polite, use the word foraging, but I prefer to use that word for gathering loopy and berries and such, which I do also according to season and the opportunity. Eighner does non simply say he disproves of using the word foraging in that way, he explains why he disproves of it. This is the manner in which a mass of the article is told in.Description is another literary device used in this article. When an author writes descriptively they describe what they are discussing in great full point to help the reader better picture what they are saying. There is a bit of descriptive writing in Eighners article such as when he says, Some students, and others, approach defrosting a freezer by chucking out the whole lot. The mass of rimed goods stays cold for a long time and items may be found still frozen or freshly thawed. Describing this process, Eighner tells us that consumers waste food because of ignorance. Not knowing a proper procedure or simply not preparing causes more avoidable wastefulness.The third device Eighner uses in this article is narration. tarradiddle is simply telling a story the way it happened. There is no stopping to explain or describe what you are discussing. Eighner practices this device when he says, I began scavenging by pulling pizzas out of the dumpster behind a pizza delivery shop. While it lasted I had a steady supply of fresh, sometimes warm pizza. Eighner tells us this to let us know that sooner of donating the good pizza to the needy, the pizza shop just throws it in thetrash.Eighners purpose in this essay is to criticize consumer wastefulness. Eighner gives proof of consumer wastefulness in order to open the eyes of consumers so people will care more rough what they throw out, and focus more on salve what they can.Eighners tone in this article is starchy. Eighner writes in a formal tone to let the consumers whom he is addressing know that just because he is unsettled does not mean his opinion is unknowledgeable. If anything he should know more about the subject because he has seen it from both sides. Eighner uses a formal tone because the intermediate consumer would mobilize more highly of his opinion if it is written formally, as contend to informally.The article leaves me wondering whether or not consumers will see and fancy what Eighner is trying to convey. Will pe ople see how much food is existence pinched? Are people going to start to stop and think about what they are throwing in the trash? Will the amount of wasted food decline, stay the same, or even increase?