'Critical Response Final Draft\r'

'Children should realize a mind of their own when it comes to their delight. At an early age children ar called to choose a shirk from the isle of the toy store that is labeled and colored then to fit the differences of their sex and non their entertainment needs. Children atomic number 18 non the ones to blame for the belief that every cheek of this creative activity is categorized gibe to genders because this idea has been in our society for ages and there has always been a think on this topic.In Christina Hoff Somers article â€Å"You Can Give a Boy a Doll, But You Cant Make Him execute With It” published on the 6th of December 201 2, in the newspaper The Atlantic she seems to be a dissipated believer that genders atomic number 18 different, for all(prenominal) one sex has purloin needs and tendencies just remain equal. This is the reason wherefore she opposes to the Swedes who are aiming for concord through gender-free catalogues and new stereoty pe-free preschool called Agile. On the other hand, Peggy Orenstein in her article â€Å"Should the World of Toys Be Gender-Free? Published on the 29th of December 2011 in the newspaper The New York Times, she appears to support cross-sex toys and execute activities. Orenstein believes that with cross-sex entertainment it would be easier and beneficial for the children to interact and communicate in the future, due to their shared experiences and that toys should not be stray according to sex. In response to Somers main lean I feel that I halt with the points the pen is making.Each individual is different by nature; genders have different needs and preferences. Not allowing children to correspond with toys that grounds their someoneality exclusively rather oblige them to play with roughthing labeled as ender-neutral that give eventually involve into equality is absurd to me because then the children bequeath not learn to have voice of their own but rather a false idea o f who they are. To pop with, one point I agree with Somers is as she states it ” Men and woman can be different- but equal” (par. ). In other speech the designer does believe that although genders differ due to biology, as manhood they remain equal. The reason agree with her is because the Swedes way of achieving a gender neutral environment is by ignoring the differences of the genders and act to introduce a way of dealing with heap as if they are one thing. To touch it clearer, when I was young I played with boys as salutary with girls. We were a team, we played with dolls and with trucks and we learned each ones needs.The boys helped us build things and as girls we learned them to take complaint of our baby dolls. This experience made me learn and consist that each gender provides something that lacks to the other. When we learn and accept each ones differences that is when we will become equal not by providing kids with a gender-neutral toy catalogue becaus e then uniqueness will not exist. Another point agree that Somers has made is when she opposes to the new preschool Agile, which has removed gender limited items from their curriculum.In Orenstein article she states that ” Every experience, every interaction, every activity-when they laugh, cry, learn, play-strengthens some neural circuits at the expense of others, and the younger the child the greater the effect” (par. 10). In other words if the children in Agile are offered an unhealthy, monitored schooling and are forced to get rid of their natural likings which benefits them while rowing up that will lead to ” subvert childrens healthy development” (Somers par. 1). Finally, another point which Somers could not have expressed better my opinion on the topic kids and entertainment is ” just leave him unaccompanied and let him play as he wants” (par. 16). In making this comment, the author says that the criteria on which the object of a childs entertainment will be chosen by, will not have to do with what gender is the toy addressed to but with what the childs entertainment needs are at that certain point.For a child to make an unbiased choice about his entertainment, demands an environment which will has raised it up knowing that although toys differ according to gender there is nothing wrong in choosing a toy of your opposite sex and not raise him up in a person who believes otherwise. In other words, ” the environment in which children play and grow can encourage a orbital cavity of aptitudes or foreclose them” (Orenstein par. 11). In conclusion, the reason wherefore I am in favor of Somers is because she accepts that sexes are different but does not believe that creating uniformity will provide us with equality.Accepting each ones differences and who we are is what will provide us with equality. Children should be let alone to explore their own likings without being obligate to be something they are not . Bottom line is that the differences of each human being are what make this world interesting. A world full of same tribe will lead us to routine.\r\n'